Semmelweis Society: Credentials, Medical Peer-Review: Practice-Selection, Satisfaction, Security.
Medical School and Practice-Selection and Money.
Home
Career Choices
Danger: Immunity
Physicians
Doctor-Lawyers
Attorneys
Contract Review
By-laws Review
Data Bank
Issues
Links
Semmelweis Services

 'Dans le pays des Aveugles, les Borgnes sont rois.' 
In the land of the Blind, the One-Eyed man is king. 
 
There is no substitute for clarity.  Write down what you want from a practice.  Try locum tenens for a day before signing the contract, and have your lawyer read the by-laws.  See the 'Issues' page for several items of interest during your search for a practice.
 
Stars and Stripes Article Page 10
Incarcerated at Madigan
Twelve days after the confrontation with Kiley, Smith arrived for duty at Madigan on Feb. 24, 1996, expecting to be temporarily assigned to the hospital staff.
To his shock, Smith was locked up in the hospital psychiatric wing.
"They handed me the pajamas that patients wear who are not allowed out, and they told me I had to hand over all of my possessions except for my uniform," Smith recounted. "I was stunned."
In a subsequent complaint to the Pentagon inspector general, Smith produced records from his trip from Germany to Madigan that show he stopped at Army Medical Command offices in Washington, D.C., to meet with officials on routine business. He said there was no indication on his travel orders that he was to be placed under medical supervision or restraint.
Smith was released from the Madigan psychiatric unit after three weeks, and was surprised when Madigan's officials invited him to join the ER staff there. He had his medical credentials restored in full after several weeks. "It was as if the whole episode had not even happened," Smith said.
Smith said the incarceration violated numerous Army regulations because there was neither a formal hearing nor any written orders committing him to the secure ward. He believes Kiley made a telephone call to Madigan officials that led to his incarceration.
 
 
 
 

Click here for a discussion of equity for all specialties.

 
Review contracts with physician-lawyers.  Financial incentive is not enough:  Insist on due-process in peer-review, and always hold 2 appointments, no matter how attractive an opportunity may seem, because power-structures change.  Confirm that myriad interlocking contracts and by-laws  (HMO, PPO, hospital...) protect you.  Documents  must specify due-process (See R. West M.D., J.D. (Physician-Attorneys).   H. Butler
 
 The idea that through the contract you can guarantee that things will work out well is a mirage. Yes, you can protect yourself economically, but the true measure of whether the contract is good is the people behind it. If they are not honest and fair it is not worth signing the best contract in the world with them. Talk to people who have been in the group for various intervals (new people, old timers, people who have left) and try to understand how the group treats you. This is far more important than having your lawyer nickle and dime them with changing the wording on the contract. Steve Dunn     


LoginJournals of AMA HomeFeedbackSite Map

SubscribeRegisterSearchDocument DeliveryE-Mail AlertClassified
How to use this site
Previous Vol. 289 No. 4,
January 22/29, 2003

Next
JAMACurrent IssueIndexesPast Issue Index
Original Contribution




 
Printable version of this item
 
View Full Text

See Related:
Authors' Articles


 

 
Return to
Table of Contents

 

 
Author/Article Information
 

to bottom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
to TOP

 
Author/Article Information
 

to bottom
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Changes in Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians, 1997-2001  
 
 
Author Information  Bruce E. Landon, MD, MBA; James Reschovsky, PhD; David Blumenthal, MD, MPP

Context  A number of forces have changed the practice of medicine in the past decade. Evidence suggests that physicians are becoming less satisfied in this environment.

Objectives  To describe changes in career satisfaction in a large, nationally representative sample of physicians and to examine market and practice factors associated with changes in physician satisfaction.

Design and Setting  Data were collected from the first 3 rounds of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey, a series of nationally representative telephone surveys of physicians in 60 US sites conducted in 1996-1997 (round 1: 12 385 respondents; 65% response rate), 1998-1999 (round 2: 12 280 respondents; 61% response rate), and 2000-2001 (round 3: 12 389 respondents; 59% response rate) for the Center for Studying Health System Change. The second and third rounds of the survey included physicians sampled in the previous round, as well as new physicians.

Participants  Primary care and specialist physicians who spent at least 20 hours per week in direct patient care activities.

Main Outcome Measures  Changes in physicians' overall satisfaction with their career and the proportion of dissatisfied physicians in particular sites.

Results  Physician satisfaction levels declined marginally between 1997 and 2001, with most of the decline occurring between 1997 and 1999. Among primary care physicians, 42.4% were very satisfied in 1997, as were 43.3% of specialists, compared with 38.5% and 41.4%, respectively, in 2001. There were nearly equal increases in those who reported that they were somewhat satisfied. Overall means mask significant differences across the 60 sites. Among 12 sites randomly selected for more intensive study, the proportion of respondents who were somewhat or very dissatisfied ranged from 8.8% of physicians in Lansing, Mich (1999), to 34.2% in Miami, Fla (1997). Between 1997 and 1999, 25.6% of primary care physicians reported decreased satisfaction and 18.1% reported improved satisfaction, while approximately equal percentages reported increased (19.8%) and decreased (20.4%) satisfaction between 1999-2001. Findings were similar for specialist physicians. In multivariable models, the strongest and most consistent predictors of change in satisfaction were changes in measures of clinical autonomy, including increases in hours worked and physicians' ability to obtain services for their patients. Changes in exposure to managed care were weakly related to changes in satisfaction.

Conclusions  Our findings demonstrate that overall physician satisfaction levels over this time period did not change dramatically. In addition, satisfaction and changes in satisfaction vary greatly among sites. Rather than declining income, threats to physicians' autonomy, to their ability to manage their day-to-day patient interactions and their time, and to their ability to provide high-quality care are most strongly associated with changes in satisfaction.

JAMA. 2003;289:442-449

View Full Text    
 
 
Author/Article Information

 
 
Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (Drs Landon and Blumenthal); Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr Landon); Institute for Health Care Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital/Partners HealthCare System (Dr Blumental), Boston, Mass; and Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC (Dr Reschovsky).
 
Corresponding Author and Reprints: Bruce E. Landon, MD, MBA, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: landon@hcp.med.harvard.edu).

Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Landon, Reschovsky, Blumenthal.

Acquisition of data: Blumenthal.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Landon, Reschovsky, Blumenthal.

Drafting of the manuscript: Landon.

Critical revision of the manuscrupt for important intellectual content: Reschovsky, Blumenthal.

Statistical expertise: Landon, Reschovsky.

Obtained funding: Blumenthal.

Study supervision: Landon, Blumenthal.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through its sole funding of the Center for Studying Health System Change, and by US Agency for Health Care Research and Quality grant P01-HS-10803.

Acknowledgment: We thank Ellen Singer of Social and Scientific Systems, Inc for her excellent computer programming. We also would like to thank Barbara McNeil, MD, PhD, Jack Hadley, PhD, and Joy Grossman, PhD, for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Deborah Collins for her editorial assistance.





 
 
to Top
 

 

 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
 
AMA HomeJAMA Info Centers Home Short Cut
Go